skate/CLAUDE.md
2026-02-23 23:16:03 -08:00

74 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown

# CLAUDE.md
Rust TUI coding agent. Ratatui + Crossterm + Tokio. See DESIGN.md for architecture decisions and PLAN.md for implementation phases.
## Commands
- `cargo build`: Build the project
- `cargo test`: Run all unit and integration tests
- `cargo test --lib`: Unit tests only
- `cargo test --test '*'`: Integration tests only
- `cargo clippy -- -D warnings`: Lint (must pass with zero warnings)
- `cargo fmt --check`: Format check
- `cargo run -- --project-dir <path>`: Run against a project directory
## Architecture
Six modules with strict boundaries:
- `src/app/` — Wiring, lifecycle, tokio runtime setup
- `src/tui/` — Ratatui rendering, input handling, vim modes. Communicates with core ONLY via channels (`UserAction` → core, `UIEvent` ← core). Never touches conversation state directly.
- `src/core/` — Conversation tree, orchestrator loop, sub-agent lifecycle
- `src/provider/``ModelProvider` trait + Claude implementation. Leaf module, no internal dependencies.
- `src/tools/``Tool` trait, registry, built-in tools. Depends only on `sandbox`.
- `src/sandbox/` — Landlock policy, path validation, command execution. Leaf module.
- `src/session/` — JSONL logging, session read/write. Leaf module.
The channel boundary between `tui` and `core` is critical — never bypass it. The TUI is a frontend; core is the engine. This separation enables headless mode for benchmarking.
## Code Style
- Use `thiserror` for error types, not `anyhow` in library code (`anyhow` only in `main.rs`/`app`)
- Prefer `impl Trait` return types over boxing when possible
- All public types need doc comments
- No `unwrap()` in non-test code — use `?` or explicit error handling
- Async functions should be cancel-safe where possible
- Use `tracing` for structured logging, not `println!` or `log`
## Documentation
Prefer a literate style: doc comments should explain *why* and *how*, not just restate the signature.
When a function or type implements an external protocol or spec:
- Document the relevant portion of the protocol inline (packet shapes, event sequences, state machines)
- Link to the authoritative external source — API reference, RFC, WHATWG spec, etc.
- Include a mapping table or lifecycle diagram when there are multiple cases to distinguish
For example, `run_stream` in `src/provider/claude.rs` documents the full SSE event sequence in a text diagram and links to both the Anthropic streaming reference and the WHATWG SSE spec. Aim for that level of context in any code that speaks a wire format or external API.
## Conversation Data Model
Events use parent IDs forming a tree (not a flat list). This enables future branching. Every event has: id, parent_id, timestamp, event_type, token_usage. A "turn" is all events between two user messages — this is the unit for token tracking.
## Testing
- Unit tests go in the same file as the code (`#[cfg(test)] mod tests`)
- Integration tests go in `tests/`
- TUI widget tests use `ratatui::backend::TestBackend` + `insta` snapshots
- Provider tests replay recorded SSE fixtures from `tests/fixtures/`
- Sandbox tests use `tempdir` and skip Landlock-specific assertions if kernel < 5.13
- Run `cargo test` before every commit
## Key Constraints
- All file I/O and process spawning in tools MUST go through `Sandbox` never use `std::fs` or `std::process::Command` directly in tool implementations
- The `ModelProvider` trait must remain provider-agnostic no Claude-specific types in the trait interface
- Session JSONL is append-only. Never rewrite history. Branching works by writing new events with different parent IDs.
- Token usage must be tracked per-event and aggregatable per-turn
## Do Not
- Add MCP support (deferred, but keep tool trait compatible)
- Use `unsafe` without discussion
- Add dependencies without checking if an existing dep covers the use case
- Modify test fixtures without re-recording from a real API session